September 11, 2017 at 7:00 PM - Work Session
| Agenda |
|---|
|
1. CALL TO ORDER
Presenter:
Habben, Board Chair
Description:
Demuth, Habben, Hesse, Humbert, Schurman, and Wesenberg.
|
|
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Description:
Board action to approve the agenda for the meeting is expected.
|
|
3. STRATEGIC INITIATIVES
Description:
This portion of the agenda has been designated to highlight programs and initiatives within the district or to invest extended time to discuss issues of strategic direction.
|
|
3.A. DISTRICT TESTING OVERVIEW
Presenter:
Sam Court, Assessment Coordinator
Description:
Mr. Court has been assigned as the District RtI and Assessment Coordinator in addition to his role as Principal at John Clark Elementary School. He has been asked to provide an overview of the ROCORI District assessment process. Using the testing calendar as a base, Mr. Court will provide a brief introduction to the district testing process including a description of the purpose of the assessments, the timing of the activities, and any additional information necessary for the School Board to understand the assessment.
|
|
3.B. PRINCIPAL/BUILDING UPDATE
Description:
As a goal for the 2017-18 school year, the building administrators are being asked to be present at School Board meetings to encourage and allow better interaction and understanding of progress at the sites. For this meeting, building administrators across the district have been asked to be present to allow board members to meet each one, hear a brief update on the opening of school, and receive a brief overview of plans for the building.
|
|
3.C. SCHOOL BOARD SELF-EVALUATION
Presenter:
Dr. Greg Vandal
Description:
In early August, School Board members participated in a survey as a self-evaluation tool. The results of the survey were provided to board members for review and consideration with the idea that the information would return for discussion in September.
Because it is the first time the board is walking through this process, Greg Vandal (who has been working with the board in 2017) has been asked to return to facilitate the discussion. The information has been provided to Dr. Vandal in preparation for the meeting and discussion. Desired Outcome: To review the self-evaluation summary information and identify or delineate themes. The idea is to help the board to see what things are working well and to look at areas for development or focus. Recommendation: No formal action is required, but the desire is to find areas in which the board may work to strengthen its purpose and direction.
Attachments:
()
|
|
4. ADJOURN
|
